A Solution to Lebanon’s Retarded, Religious Personal Status Law

We Lebanese are famous for our tolerance. Yeah, right. The only thing we should be famous for is being hypocrites when it comes to separating religion and law. In public, most people with human IQs claim they wish we had a truly secular system. In private, most Christians cling to the crooked law which gives them, 39-43% of the population, 50% of the influence. As for Muslims, they’re happy with the 50-50 facade, but know well enough their influence is far greater. The result is a retarded political system full of denial, paranoia and an inability to keep up with the times.

But, that’s not what we’re here to talk about. Fixing our constitution and the Taef Accord is just as likely as women becoming equal to men in religion’s eyes. So, why not focus on stuff that impact us personally, like getting married, inheriting our fair shares and of course getting divorced and remarried.

Problem?

For Christian who think I'm excluding them from the oppression of women part, read the Bible well...

Personal status laws (a7wel shakhsiyeh) in the Lebanese constitution are under the jurisdiction of each religious sect. Which means, priests and sheikhs decide what you can and cannot do with your life in terms of familial ties and relationships. That’s fine and dandy if you’re blindly convinced your religion is absolutely right and true. But, for people with the courage and brains to think critically, interpretations of the Bible and Quran are not the ideal basis for my personal choices and status.

If we want to look at it legally, our sheikhs and imams and priests and bishops are not elected individuals. They’re people assigned to their posts. Which means, we did not vote for them and thus it’s not us who put them in power, yet, they have the authority to control my freedom and pursuit of happiness… A clear violation of what democracy and freedom stand for.

To go further, this makes Lebanese people unequal under law. Which is to say that a Maronite man and a Sunni man are completely different entities under each religion’s law, when in reality they are both humans and Lebanese citizens. Some of what is ok for Maronites is not for Sunnis, and vice versa, and that system most definitely does NOT promote tolerance and equality.

At this point, I assume all of you will agree we need a united personal status law based on logic, reason and pragmatism. If not, stop reading and go pray or beat your wife or something. However, most of you will also agree that that dream is far too ambitious.

Here, I would like to suggest something which might seem funny at first. The acknowledged sects in Lebanon are

  • Alawite
  • Armenian Catholic
  • Armenian Orthodox
  • Assyrian Church of the East
  • Chaldean Catholic
  • Copts
  • Druze
  • Greek Catholic
  • Greek Orthodox
  • Isma’ili
  • Jewish
  • Maronite
  • Protestant
  • Roman Catholic
  • Sunni
  • Shi’a
  • Syriac Catholic
  • Syriac Orthodox

Solution?

Why not add an extra one called whatever you want to call it? That 19th sect would be acknowledged as a sect by Lebanese Law, which means personal status of the people who subscribe to it would be under its jurisdiction. The catch is, that the personal status law would be a modern and fair one. One where the equivalent of civil marriage, inheritance laws and other vital issues are based on successful secular models elsewhere around the world.

This way, I’d convert there, and so would my future wife, and we’d live happily, and my daughter would inherit a fair share of my fortune (which I have yet to accumulate) just like my son would (instead of my female offspring getting half of what my male offspring would like in Sunni laws for example).

What does this solve?

Well, let’s get real and face it, true reform in corrupt Lebanon is virtually impossible. Also, some people genuinely believe beating their wives and raping them is ok religiously (especially after a fatwa was issued  against the domestic violence law proposed to parliament last month). So, these people can keep acting like savages, and for the rest of us who respect the fact we are the result of billions of years of successful evolution and act like it, we can live happily in a more tolerant and fair law.

Conclusion?

Loopholes rock! Why? Because even the most dramatic of changes such as revolutions, have proven useless in the Arab world and Lebanon. So, why not bypass the stupidity and backwardness? Why not push for amending the constitution, like it has been so many times, to create an extra sect? That way, we’d use the system to our benefit instead of fighting it like sissy leftists in Lebanon who plant empty tents and stick stupid posters on Riad el Solh square.

Loopholes! <3

Comments

  1. eceday says:

    I love the idea, I understand the frustration with the crazy laws, and I share them with you, but that doesn’t sound like a realistic solution.. extensive activism, lobbying and education are needed to solve such problems.. but i might be wrong.. maybe someone else can find a way to make it happen overnight..

  2. gr8 solution…ambitious…but gr8!
    i believe first thing to do is to get ALL RELIGIOUS FIGURES OFF THE TELEVISION!!(ALL)
    let them stick to religion…stay out of political affairs n ppl’s daily lives…when ppl need them…ppl cn go to them…they shudnt be in our faces n makin speeches 24/7!!
    n 2nd thing…a revamp of the whole political system….which is impossible until those currently running it disappear/die/burn(which is also apparently impossible…they’r like druids :P )

  3. Anth says:

    Gino.. Timothy is from the Old Testament, thus Jewish related before Christian.. but I get your point.. but not a good solution..

  4. Ray says:

    what to call the new sect … ;) Lebites?

Trackbacks

  1. [...] This is fantastic news, and was at first hard for me to swallow. The leader of one of the biggest religious groups in Lebanon has publicly endorsed and thrown his weight behind a fair and practical law when it comes to Personal Status. Read up on my thoughts about Lebanon’s retarded here. [...]

  2. [...] To this, Samy said it would be his ideal choice, but went on to say that at the moment it was unthinkable. His views are similar to mine, and talking of a secular political system is stupid when everything else, including laws, education and overall mentalities are still so heavily reliant on old men in robes. Samy said that for a real secular state, we need to abolish religious schools and political parties. This makes complete sense and we agree on this. I sought a more far-fetched solution though, read about it here. [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s